![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Case Study: DDB Seattle
Business benefits: Statistics: "Like others in our industry nationwide, we are leaner and working harder, but we see offering work options as a free benefit that has many advantages for the employer." Work options attract and retain the best Chief Operating Officer Sydney Hunsdale views work options as a good fit with many tasks and positions in advertising. “By the nature of the work we do, marketing, advertising and public relations units can provide some flexibility in work location or start time,” she says. “To keep the best talent and to keep happy, creative employees, we are willing to make adjustments and changes to the standard arrangement of 8 to 5 at the office.” Advertising and public relations also are extremely competitive industries, driven by deadlines and the need to keep clients happy. “Our employees are who we are,” Hunsdale says. “We need people who can provide the best creative services on target, on time and within budget.” Work options are work productivity and employee retention tools that help DDB to be one of the best in the business. Work quality and quantity increase Creative and customized options Teamwork, communication addressed Work/life balance breeds loyalty Formerly an account executive, Hillary Miller has always worked her 40 plus hours per week. Until her daughter began kindergarten in September 2004, however, Miller worked Monday through Thursday in the office, then put in another eight hours from home between Friday and Sunday when her child slept or was cared for by her husband. Appointed Senior Vice President of Strategic Planning in 2004, Miller attributes her own retention and ability to keep her career on track during child rearing to her employer’s flexibility and willingness to consider alternative work arrangements. “I don’t think I could have gotten that deal anywhere else,” she says. Media Payable Coordinator Cynthia Williams commutes to downtown Seattle from Port Orchard in Kitsap County. She loves her 6 a.m. to 3 p.m. flextime schedule. With DDB’s headquarters in New York and a satellite office in Washington D.C., the accounting department also benefits from these extra hours of coverage. “I greatly appreciate that my employer has always had flextime,” Williams says. “The ferry system doesn't always accommodate work schedules and runs on its own time, so the fact that my employer lets me set my own hours is of great value to me as a commuter. Traffic can be a nightmare, so by having flex hours I'm able to put in a full day plus have some time to myself at night and not be so stressed out. I have always counted flextime as a benefit that I would greatly miss if it ever went away,” she adds. Managing Partner Janice Merlino says, “It costs too much to replace employees. Besides, it sounds trite, but if people are happier, they do a better job. People are less grumpy, so I spend less time dealing with personnel issues.” Work/life balance valued Managing partner walks the talk The combination of telework and flextime and lots of laptop computers mean employees stay connected and productive more hours of the day and more days of the workweek. When Human Resource Director Stephanie Pearson needed to juggle her son’s late arrival day at school, she could stay productive and accessible. Telephone calls to the East Coast can be made from home in the early morning hours without the need to drive to the office. And creative staff can brainstorm together in a coffee shop or work without interruption from home to meet project needs. “Like others in our industry nationwide, we are leaner and working harder than in the 90s, but we see offering work options as a free benefit that has advantages for the employer,” Hunsdale says. “Flextime alleviates commuting pressures for some employees, but has also been an opportunity for expanded hours of coverage in some departments. Telework not only helps work/life balance, it also is, first and foremost, a work productivity tool.”
Revised April 2005 by Commuter Challenge. Original version © 2000 Washington State University Cooperative Extension Energy Program. This publication contains material written and produced for public distribution. You may reprint this written material, provided you do not use it to endorse a commercial product. Please reference by title and credit Washington State University Cooperative Extension Energy Program and Commuter Challenge.
|
|||||||||||||